Nothing In Particular

Subjects that don't have their own home
User avatar
izzy wizzy
Needs to get out more
Posts: 1540
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Auckland NZ
Contact:

#16846 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by izzy wizzy »

andrew Ivimey wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:28 pm Our mice are few and far between and only in the garden, so far. Hedgehogs (2) and bastard squirrels prolific.

Quandary.
Hedgehogs were something we encouraged in our UK garden. Here they are a pest that we trap for. Hard to make the transition. They're bloody huge as well.
User avatar
andrew Ivimey
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8404
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
Location: Bedford

#16847 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by andrew Ivimey »

This is a hedgehog...
Attachments
20241110_112642.jpg
20241110_112642.jpg (82.44 KiB) Viewed 2011 times
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.
User avatar
Dave the bass
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 12306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.

#16848 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by Dave the bass »

I'm reading Geddy Lee's book, 'My effin' life'.

The word 'shoddy' comes up, his Dad worked for a while in a shoddy mill he says.

I know we've covered this before, he gives a description of the word and says "Shoddy was inferior material spun from waste woolen cloth and used for stuffing inexpensive furniture ".

But still...

Pfffttttt, shoddy!
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5897
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#16849 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by simon »

I'm having a moment and can't convince myself I'm correct. With a traditional centre tapped mains transformer intended for full wave rectification, if the whole of the secondary is used with bridge rectification the current capacity of the secondary should be halved (compared to full wave CT) because all the secondary is being used all the time. Right?
Max N
Old Hand
Posts: 1492
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:10 pm

#16850 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by Max N »

simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5897
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#16851 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by simon »

Not really, but thanks Max. It's permissible Iac of the secondary that's eluding me - I think it's half the rating because the full winding is in use all the time with bridge rectification, whereas each half winding is on then off then on again etc. so full current rating for full wave rectification. Though it's probably not quite that simple.
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 16032
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#16852 Re: Nothing In Particular

Unread post by Nick »

So from the link Max gave

FULL WAVE: Iac = Idc

BRIDGE: Iac = Idc x 1.61

So from that I would say that the rating of a transformer rated for full wave should be de-rated by 62% (1 / 1.61 = 0.62 )
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
Post Reply