I agree with you on that, though I question the whole Arduino thing not just its IDE. But thats just me I guess. Avr Libc is just fine IMHO.Arduino IDE as from a professional standpoint it's very limited
General Raspberry Pi stuff
#166 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
#167 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
and there was me thinking Arduino was a hobby enterprise.....I was naive enough to think nobody would criticise it from a professional standpoint...
just goes to show, mea culpa.
snigg...oh hang on
just goes to show, mea culpa.
snigg...oh hang on
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
#168 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
Yep, but given there is no real downside, why not take it to the next level. Hobbyists can still be serious about stuff and want to do it as well as possible.Arduino was a hobby enterprise
AFAIK (and I haven’t spent much time with it), the main thing about Arduino is the usb bootloader. given you can buy a AVR programmer for a couple of quid, the moment you want to make your own boards with built in processors Arduino becomes a handicap rather than an aid.
I find it ironic that (first one I looked at) for example a Arduino Nano Every for £9.64 contains a ATMEGA4809-AU which is £1.32, and also happens to contain a ARM Cortex M0+ that’s there just to be the USB to serial converter.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5503
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#169 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
Not a critique of the Arduino IDE, just that if you are or have been a professional developer, the IDE is at best weak and at worst, completely pants. And there are a lot of professional developers who have played with the Arduino concept. The main thing is that you don't have to use their IDE, you can use a more capable framework like Eclipse...
I agree with t'other Nick about the architectural constraints.
Just for the hell of it, I read up about the history of the Arduino... Talk about messy!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arduino
I agree with t'other Nick about the architectural constraints.
Just for the hell of it, I read up about the history of the Arduino... Talk about messy!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arduino
Originally, it never was for hobbyists - it was for non-engineers at an Italian university.
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
#170 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
yeah I guess discussions like this could go on for ever....
I get caught in the soc discussions against my better judgement.....I started SOC with Atmel studio strictly in assembler using my dragon but when I realised there were libraries for things like pressure guages and light detectors and sd cards and all manor of screens, it wasn't difficlult to try Arduino.
So now I sometimes write c++ in Arduino Ide(with the arduino libraries) and upload to atmel chips via the dragon...bootloader be damned!
It's just how I've rolled, probably the easiest route, not necessarily the best.... and then there's the ESP32s..just plug them into the ide...they just work, and to me I don't give a hoot about the professionalism of it all.
The reason I keep challenging Nick DeSmiths posts is simply because he keeps raising the 'Professional' argument...and the way he writes them comes across to me as if he thinks he's the only one.....Sorry Nick, I'm sure it's not the case but that's just how it seems to me.
I get caught in the soc discussions against my better judgement.....I started SOC with Atmel studio strictly in assembler using my dragon but when I realised there were libraries for things like pressure guages and light detectors and sd cards and all manor of screens, it wasn't difficlult to try Arduino.
So now I sometimes write c++ in Arduino Ide(with the arduino libraries) and upload to atmel chips via the dragon...bootloader be damned!
It's just how I've rolled, probably the easiest route, not necessarily the best.... and then there's the ESP32s..just plug them into the ide...they just work, and to me I don't give a hoot about the professionalism of it all.
The reason I keep challenging Nick DeSmiths posts is simply because he keeps raising the 'Professional' argument...and the way he writes them comes across to me as if he thinks he's the only one.....Sorry Nick, I'm sure it's not the case but that's just how it seems to me.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5503
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#171 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
Apologies - not the intention... well aware there are others here...ed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:26 pm yThe reason I keep challenging Nick DeSmiths posts is simply because he keeps raising the 'Professional' argument...and the way he writes them comes across to me as if he thinks he's the only one.....Sorry Nick, I'm sure it's not the case but that's just how it seems to me.
The "professional" vs. "hobbyist" division is really about how you approach s/w development and not an elitist distinction, IMHO. A typical hobbyist won't give two hoots about anything other than getting their stuff to work.
Someone who has earnt their daily crust doing development will typically expect a lot more, even if doing a small hack in the workshop. Using one example: Git integration or other version control system. Also code verifiers, more sophisticated debuggers, IDE configuration etc. etc.
Amazingly, not everything is a criticism - simple is good for many things, but expectations and patterns of work vary.
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
#172 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
I think this covers a lot of the points mentioned, and i certainly relate to the Arduino as a hobbyists platform, irrespective of where it came from....
https://embedded.fm/blog/2017/8/12/dont ... ional-work
to take Nick(G)'s point about cost. That is reflected in the blog, and I entirely agree. But, whenever I used an arduino board it was always a Chinese board from ebay and they are in the region of £2.50, and not £9.
Personally I don't know whether I'd ever use Arduino for a commercial product, probably not. Even the mickey mouse stuff that I've done with Arduino has been a nightmare on the version control front....but then I'm not sure whether most hobbyist Arduino users are even aware of version control.
In the end I beleive it's just another example of how the IT phenomena has evolved...I mean how many times have you(NickDS) had to remedy development performed by users that are completely unaware of standard method or standards in general. This applies to some so called IT professionals as well. This is a phenomena that I beleive started the moment users had a computer on their desks, as opposed to a terminal....but it may be dying out now with better corporate standards and control, and more professional education.
https://embedded.fm/blog/2017/8/12/dont ... ional-work
to take Nick(G)'s point about cost. That is reflected in the blog, and I entirely agree. But, whenever I used an arduino board it was always a Chinese board from ebay and they are in the region of £2.50, and not £9.
Personally I don't know whether I'd ever use Arduino for a commercial product, probably not. Even the mickey mouse stuff that I've done with Arduino has been a nightmare on the version control front....but then I'm not sure whether most hobbyist Arduino users are even aware of version control.
In the end I beleive it's just another example of how the IT phenomena has evolved...I mean how many times have you(NickDS) had to remedy development performed by users that are completely unaware of standard method or standards in general. This applies to some so called IT professionals as well. This is a phenomena that I beleive started the moment users had a computer on their desks, as opposed to a terminal....but it may be dying out now with better corporate standards and control, and more professional education.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5503
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#173 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
When dealing with historical code, through gritted teeth, it's often best to leave well alone - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, then rewrite it to current standards.
Main issue was always with traders, most of whom believe that they are a superior advanced lifeform and consequently exempt from normal controls, when they hire in a random PhD quant to do some hideous derivative risk modelling in Excel, then go back to do a post-doc leaving an load of awful VB and no documentation, comments or anything resembling a supportable application...
In all the teams I've run, involving 100s of developers over the years, I've always insisted on tight coding standards, often ANSI compliance and the use of static code analysers to prescan code and check compliance. Typically, the delivery workflow involved the Atlassian toolchain plus heavy QA and regression testing.
Really good developers who are are team players are as rare as hens teeth.
Main issue was always with traders, most of whom believe that they are a superior advanced lifeform and consequently exempt from normal controls, when they hire in a random PhD quant to do some hideous derivative risk modelling in Excel, then go back to do a post-doc leaving an load of awful VB and no documentation, comments or anything resembling a supportable application...
In all the teams I've run, involving 100s of developers over the years, I've always insisted on tight coding standards, often ANSI compliance and the use of static code analysers to prescan code and check compliance. Typically, the delivery workflow involved the Atlassian toolchain plus heavy QA and regression testing.
Really good developers who are are team players are as rare as hens teeth.
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
#174 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
IMHO, the problem with being a team player is often the rest of the team. It normally evolves to whatever the weakest member wants, as often the weakest member is better at convincing management that what they want is to the benefit of all (as they have realised that convincing management is easyier than learning how to be a competent developer).
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
#175 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
And of course the incompetence team player who is good at talking to management is generally the one that gets promoted to management, and so is likely to be in agreement with the next iteration of the least competent in the team. And so it goes on.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5503
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#176 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
Very good The Peter Principle at work...
That's sometimes the case, but I've always operated a meritocracy and generally with "360" reviews, from which it's difficult to hide.
One of the better C++ coding standards in common use is High Integrity C++ - highly regarded and a worthwhile reference for any C++ programmer, professional or otherwise - I've used it for years to keep myself on the straight and narrow.
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
#177 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
Not exactly the same thing, but similar in effect.Very good The Peter Principle at work...
Maybe, but wasn't going to give my details just to read that. The fact that they have reduced it to 155 rules backs up my preference for C instead of C++.One of the better C++ coding standards in common use is
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5503
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#178 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
I'll send you a copy...Nick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:23 pmNot exactly the same thing, but similar in effect.Very good The Peter Principle at work...
Maybe, but wasn't going to give my details just to read that. The fact that they have reduced it to 155 rules backs up my preference for C instead of C++.One of the better C++ coding standards in common use is
I bet there's loads of folk that could come up with more than 155 ways (probably unintentionally) to totally screw up a C program!
I was part of the ANSI C X3J11 working group (it was excruciatingly tedious) back in the 1980s, so started out on C. I still have my original copy of K&R from the late 1970s in the workshop on the "Shelf of Doom"...
I don't dislike it, but it's so unsafe in so many ways that I haven't used it for a long while, except for very specific time critical loops where C++ may well have been just as good.
Edit: and in short initialisation code on microprocessors where the framework requires C-style binding.
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
#179 Re: General Raspberry Pi stuff
No doubt, but we have been around this loop before.I bet there's loads of folk that could come up with more than 155 ways (probably unintentionally) to totally screw up a C program!
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5503
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact: