SRPP stage useing a 5670

If they glow, this is the place to be
acorn
User
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:41 pm

#1 SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by acorn »

Good day all

What is the advantage of useing a SRPP input stage as apposed to a normal input stage
would it be a better frequency response and lower distortion figures ? or are there any better
circuits out there I could use.

Acorn
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20156
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#2 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by Mike H »

I'd forgotten what SRPP is, so Googled - ah yes ...

This may, or may not, help:

http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/SRPP_Blencowe.pdf

I would have used it for the upper valve being more like a constant current source, rather than a resistor,so therefore should be more linear, but having read a bit of the above I'm not sure now :shock:
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
ruffrecords
User
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 8:01 am
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

#3 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by ruffrecords »

The SRPP is more of an output stage designed to deliver power to a load rather than an input stage. They also suffer from relatively high distortion. Using a pair of triodes in a mu follower stage would provide more gain and lower distortion. I use an ECC88 based mu follower in one of my microphone preamp designs.

Cheers

Ian
Wolfgang
Old Hand
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 3:08 pm

#4 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by Wolfgang »

What is the advantage of useing a SRPP input stage as apposed to a normal input stage
None, if you don’t need more than let's say 30% of the idle current of a simple SE input stage into the load of the next stage. Simplicity of the circuit and the best suited tube for the job is more in this case IMO.
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15694
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#5 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by Nick »

They were fashionable for some time, due in part I think because some Japanese designers used them
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#6 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by JamesD »

Tubecad explaining what the SRPP stage is, how to design it and why not to bother except for some limited use cases :D

https://www.tubecad.com/may2000/

ciao

James
ruffrecords
User
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 8:01 am
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

#7 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by ruffrecords »

You need to take the opinions of TubeCAD with a healthy does of salt. His analysis is excellent but his applications (use cases -ugh what a horrible term) are equally limited. The SRPP is a very useful tool in the tube circuit designers arsenal but like all topologies, considered in isolation it has its limitations and advantages.

Cheers

Ian
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8836
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#8 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by Paul Barker »

There was a Glass Audio article which came out in favour, with the condition use different values cathode resistors for each stage. Thats all I recall.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#9 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by ed »

I messed with srpp quite a bit back in the day and found an interesting article about having the correct load for the correct valve. This messing about showed me that some of the accepted circuits on the internet were not producing the best sq.

I wrote a bit on my web page after I'd lost the original article, but included another article by Merlin Blencowe:

https://vitalstates.org/vsl/2a3-single-ended/

I've since found the original article, which has a new web site:

https://ttradio.net/srpp-amplifier-theory-pictures/

following the equation for Rl I got the best front end(IMO) for the 2A3. I usually miss the point, but fwiw I like srpp.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#10 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by JamesD »

Hi Ian,

I find I agree with JRB far more than I disagree with him... but that's just me and for an engineering subject audio circuit and system design is certainly a broad church.. His SRPP article has always drawn a lot of comment and criticism..

Welcome here, btw, its great to have another experienced engineer here :D

Given your experience, I'm curious as to when you think using SRPP is the optimum choice and when it might be the expedient choice?

ciao

James
ruffrecords
User
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 8:01 am
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

#11 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by ruffrecords »

I just typed a big long reply to this and then lost the lot. I hate Chromebooks where the control key is just below the shift key! Accidentally pressing Ctrl W closes the current tab and everything you types is lost.

Anyway, very short version. My interest in valves is for use in professional audio, particularly mixers. Often amplifier stages in a mixer are required to be able to drive quite low loads (2K5 is not unusual) to high levels (10V rms is not unusual). Bottom line is an 6922 based SRPP will do both without requiring more than about 6mA quiescent from the HT - total HT current is important in a mixer containing many amplifiers. Unfortunately, the SRPP stage on its own produces a lot of distortion at high levels so I use it with one half of a 12AX7 with about 20dB of NFB. This combination creates a very useful general purpose amplifier with up to 40dB gain.

Cheers

Ian
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15694
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#12 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by Nick »

Unfortunately, the SRPP stage on its own produces a lot of distortion at high levels so I use it with one half of a 12AX7 with about 20dB of NFB. This combination creates a very useful general purpose amplifier with up to 40dB gain.
Similar idea to the Macdonald Augmented Cathode Followers

https://jrossmacdonald.com/jrm/wp-conte ... llower.pdf
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#13 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by JamesD »

Ian,

Many thanks for the reply - a shame your more detailed one was lost as I have enjoyed your longer posts on DiyAudio.

I'm a Broadcast Engineer myself and have worked both Video and Sound - on the Sound side from valve EMI mixers, etc. forward so I appreciate the control of power draw in valve circuits!

I did wonder how you drove 10Vrms or 14 volts peak into 2500R with just 6mA in Class A - I would expect high distortion with that using any triode based circuit... glad that you found a way around it and other than the MacDonald circuits that Nick referenced not sure what I would use at close to 6mA draw...
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15694
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#14 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by Nick »

He did say "6mA quiescent from the HT"
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#15 Re: SRPP stage useing a 5670

Post by JamesD »

Indeed - am I missing something? I think if you drive 14.14 V across 2500R you need 5.6mA that leaves 400uA for the triode - look at that on a 6922 plate curve and its well into the lower curvature region yielding high distortion - I know the SRPP is effectively PP but the valve is still pulled into the heavily non linear part of the curve so distortion will increase ... isn't it the global feedback loop that keeps distortion under control on a conventional PP amplifier when its operating in this region and SRPP doesn't have that on its own - its only present in the augmented versions?

ah or do you think it draws more than 6mA under load - how is that CLASS A then - I thought SRPP only operated in Class A?
Post Reply