bias capacitor
#1 bias capacitor
another naive question guys:
can somebody advise what's the best type of capacitor in the C? position. I think I need to trap the - dc content but not affect the ac load...am I looking at this the right way?...If I use an electrolytic backwards then aren't I putting it in the wrong way round with respect to the signal?
can somebody advise what's the best type of capacitor in the C? position. I think I need to trap the - dc content but not affect the ac load...am I looking at this the right way?...If I use an electrolytic backwards then aren't I putting it in the wrong way round with respect to the signal?
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- andrew Ivimey
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8318
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
- Location: Bedford
#2
hm, well here's some one with the understanding of a beginner in some matters but this is a much simpler version of how a VT4C is biased in Ongaku.
I used an electrolytic never imagining I could use anything else. In the original Ongaku diagram (I found on the net) the polarity was the wrong way round. I spotted that and felt very chuffed.
I used an electrolytic never imagining I could use anything else. In the original Ongaku diagram (I found on the net) the polarity was the wrong way round. I spotted that and felt very chuffed.
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#3
Can be a 'lytic, positive end would be to ground.
Assuming 'bias' is negative Volts.
Assuming 'bias' is negative Volts.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21399
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#4
I would assume, cos there is a cap in the input line.Mike H wrote:Can be a 'lytic, positive end would be to ground.
Assuming 'bias' is negative Volts.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
#5
Thanks Mike...I've had an eletrolytic in for the last 3 or 4 years but I suddenly had doubts regarding my existing question and the 'backwards' thing. I was thinking about how Pete Millet uses poly foil and thought maybe I had got it wrong........Mike H wrote:Can be a 'lytic, positive end would be to ground.
Assuming 'bias' is negative Volts.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#6
I only put that in, 'cause just in case someone came along saying "but what if it's positive bias"pre65 wrote:I would assume, cos there is a cap in the input line.Mike H wrote:Can be a 'lytic, positive end would be to ground.
Assuming 'bias' is negative Volts.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
#7
I'm beginning to wish I hadn't looked at this now........I think I took a lot for granted when I first put this circuit together as I don't know how I arrived at the value for the cap in the first place.....
can anybody suggest how to get the time constant for that cap because I don't see a load resistor to work with.....and hence the pass frequency
or suggest a place to read....I havn't been able to find anything with my usual(bad) search phrases, and RDH and Jones seem pretty quiet on the subject
can anybody suggest how to get the time constant for that cap because I don't see a load resistor to work with.....and hence the pass frequency
or suggest a place to read....I havn't been able to find anything with my usual(bad) search phrases, and RDH and Jones seem pretty quiet on the subject
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#8
It would be versus the grid leak resistor value? Whatever that is. Plus, whatever it is that supplies the negative bias will be in parallel with the cap.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
#9
ahhhh thanks Mike....
just to clarify, using my circuit below. I've taken the average R to be half the 20k pot plus the 10k, say 20k in all. Which I make 0.79uf cap for 10hz at -3db. Does that sound anywhere near right?
just to clarify, using my circuit below. I've taken the average R to be half the 20k pot plus the 10k, say 20k in all. Which I make 0.79uf cap for 10hz at -3db. Does that sound anywhere near right?
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#10
I guess so, I'd make it a whole round 1uF for convenience
How is the -120V derived, is it smoothed at all, if not, cap may need to be larger to minimize hum ripple from that direction?
How is the -120V derived, is it smoothed at all, if not, cap may need to be larger to minimize hum ripple from that direction?
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
#11
this is a new one, as yet untested...ignore the 100k, it's shown on the other diagram......The Tx is two RS 2x18v, all wired in series....I have found that the RS txs are rated for 230v and give consistently good results when fed 250+ volts...together with a lower load than the rating I'm expecting between 110v and 120v.
I'm also playing with CLC because I'm curious what effect the bias ripple has on the output.
I'm also playing with CLC because I'm curious what effect the bias ripple has on the output.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#12
According to that you can easily get the maximum minus Volts there is available, do you need that much?
Now the cap value is looking like what's the best value for minimum ripple from this bias supply.
Now the cap value is looking like what's the best value for minimum ripple from this bias supply.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
#13
yepAccording to that you can easily get the maximum minus Volts there is available, do you need that much?
don't understand this one though!....I thought the cap question was answered before, providing my sums were correct..the pie filter caps in the bias supply are all sorted. Well, as sorted as I really need because the comparison was between this and the previous half wave rectifier with an RC filter, so I was curious to see if there was a difference.Now the cap value is looking like what's the best value for minimum ripple from this bias supply.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#14
Edited
I forgot about the 100k resistors on the preset wipers, OK so this isolates the pi filter from the grid leak decouple cap, as an RC filter, so as you were.
I forgot about the 100k resistors on the preset wipers, OK so this isolates the pi filter from the grid leak decouple cap, as an RC filter, so as you were.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."