Regulator heatsink
#16
Yes, that was a typo, it should have been ESR, my bad. My thought was to look at the data sheet for the component in question. Its always usefull to know the spec's for many of the parts you need, they sheets are not hard to understand if you get into the hang of doing so. RS or Farnell web site is a good source of those sorts of references. And IMHO, getting used to checking such things, make the process of designing stuff more about design and less a painting by numbers sort of process.
Given the VA rating of the TX and the ESR of the cap, it should be possible to use PSD or paper to calculate the voltage drops and sort of peak current you will need the components to handle.
A 50VA TX, means that each secondary will be happy supplying 2.77 (25/9) amps into a resistive load. So the 1.5A load should be ok, (1.5*1.61 = 2.45A).
If we knew the regulaton of the TX we could get closer to the actual voltage. Assuming its 10% (And I can't remember which is the british or american way of calculating this Paul?), then 9*0.1*(2.77-2.54)/2.54 means the voltage into the bridge should be just under 9.1v so near enough to the rated value to not be worth worrying about.
Given the VA rating of the TX and the ESR of the cap, it should be possible to use PSD or paper to calculate the voltage drops and sort of peak current you will need the components to handle.
A 50VA TX, means that each secondary will be happy supplying 2.77 (25/9) amps into a resistive load. So the 1.5A load should be ok, (1.5*1.61 = 2.45A).
If we knew the regulaton of the TX we could get closer to the actual voltage. Assuming its 10% (And I can't remember which is the british or american way of calculating this Paul?), then 9*0.1*(2.77-2.54)/2.54 means the voltage into the bridge should be just under 9.1v so near enough to the rated value to not be worth worrying about.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
#17
Yes, well I was with you, and agreed right up until the C/W calcs. Have a break whille I go through this. You have.....Nick wrote:Andrew:Oh, good, in that case, does my number make sense?First time out I did the calcs
Junction temperature will be equal to:
TJ = TA + PD (Q[HEAT SINK] + Q[CASE-TO-HEAT SINK] + Q[JC])
where Q[CASE-TO-HEAT SINK] is usually about 0.2 C/W
and you have Q[JC] as 4 C/W (seems high to me, is that the power section/control section or combined?)
Anyway,
TJ = 40°C + 6W (7.8°C/W + 0.2°C/W + 4°C/W) = 40°C + (6W * 12C/W) = 40°C + 72°C = 112°C
So yes, OK, assuming the chassis don't get above 50°C and the thermal bond to the angle iron is OK.
cheers,
-- Andrew
#18
I took it from here
http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets/nat ... 009060.PDF
Which gives it as 4 degC/W for the T package.
http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets/nat ... 009060.PDF
Which gives it as 4 degC/W for the T package.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12276
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#19
Pah! Same results as mine except I have a cut finger
You Scientists
DTB
You Scientists
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21399
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#20
pre65 wrote:
Just checked my parts box and i have 16 1N5820 which seem to be 20V 3A schottky diodes-will those be better ?
Hi-will these schottky diodes be man enough ?
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
#21
Try simulating in PSD, in a bridge, maybe, the max reverse voltage they should see is 12v, full wave they would be too low voltage.
I use them in my 300b supply and they seem ok, so you should be ok, but the peak current will be far more than 3amp I suspect.
I use them in my 300b supply and they seem ok, so you should be ok, but the peak current will be far more than 3amp I suspect.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21399
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#22
Hi-my PSU designer wont accept 1N5820 so i have got some others coming,
IR50SQ100 100V @5A.
Might as well try and get it done proper like.
IR50SQ100 100V @5A.
Might as well try and get it done proper like.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12276
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#23
Yeah, I've been playing with Psud too, It doesn't have any UF4*** series either, is there an apdate or summink we don't know about or do we just use the 1N**** equiv's?
DTB
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5643
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#25
What an excellent thread! I've been thinking about regulating the phono heaters but hadn't got my head round the maths fully. Thanks to Nick and Andrew for their input here. I've worked my way through it and knocked a spreadsheet up to model it - I find it easier to understand what's going on this way. Also has the added bonus that when I've forgotten it all this time next week when my head is full of work rubbish I can revisit the spreadsheet . The sense resistor bit is done, and most of the TX part. Just the heatsink calcs to do. I'll post it if anyone's interested, when it's finished.
I got a bit lost with the VA rating . Guessing wildly, should the 1.61 be 1.41 (root 2)?Nick wrote:So the 1.5A load should be ok, (1.5*1.61 = 2.45A).
Is 2.54 a typo - should it be 2.45?Nick wrote:then 9*0.1*(2.77-2.54)/2.54
#26
http://www.sowter.co.uk/htspec.htmI got a bit lost with the VA rating Confused. Guessing wildly, should the 1.61 be 1.41 (root 2)?
Yes, sorry.Is 2.54 a typo - should it be 2.45?
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12276
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#28
Maths...Pah!
If you use my technique Simon wear gardening gloves to save cutting your finger, that way you wont need to file the burr off too
DTBodger
If you use my technique Simon wear gardening gloves to save cutting your finger, that way you wont need to file the burr off too
DTBodger
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5643
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#29
I like your way Dave, there's a lot to be said for it. Unfortunately my instinct isn't that good, and my parts bin very small indeed. Using the spreadsheet I've just found out that the 50VA tx which I thought was plenty big enough is actually too small. Still, it'll be handy for something else.
#30
I need to find where the 1.61 number comes from. I am not convinced its a exact value like 1.414 and 0.9 more a approximation depending on the amount of load current at the cap size.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.