GM70 PP

What people are working on at the moment
RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

#16 Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick »

What value of virtual cathodes would you use for a GM70 ? I'm not sure it's even practical, based on the tube datasheet I just looked at (20V, 3A heaters, plate current minimum 800mA).

With a pair of 20R resistors, both see 500mA through them but one has the plate current in the same direction and the other has it in opposition. So one resistor sees 910mA the other -100mA. 16W dissipation, so you'd need at least 30W (I normally multiply by 4, so >64W). Plus of course you're making the DC board provide the additional current through the virtual cathodes, so total 4A instead of 3A.

If you pick, say, 100R the current drops to 500mA but the dissipation goes up to 25W.
Screenshot_2019-07-14-11-09-46-1.png
Unless of course I have something wrong, not for the first time.
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5600
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#17 Re: GM70 PP

Post by simon »

Nuts! You'd convinced me with the space charge scenario! :)

I can't think why a different part of the DC supply might sound different though?
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5600
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#18 Re: GM70 PP

Post by simon »

800mA through a GM70? Sounds like a factor of 10 too high? Or am I missing something with this topology?
RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

#19 Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick »

Is this the wrong datasheet? I've never used a GM70.
Screenshot_20190714_151710.jpg
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8862
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#20 Re: GM70 PP

Post by Paul Barker »

Not relevant for our use of the valve. Look at the characteristic curves.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

#21 Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick »

Paul Barker wrote: Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:15 pm Not relevant for our use of the valve. Look at the characteristic curves.
Ok fair enough. What mA would you expect through the cathode?
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8862
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#22 Re: GM70 PP

Post by Paul Barker »

I’m not up to date on gm70 sweet operating position. Depends on so much.

There must exist examples of pp gm70 circuits.

Otherwise you’ll have to create push pull compound characteristic curves put in you’re loafline which links the two and choose you’re operating Point and limits. Should all be in RDH but should be findable on the interweb.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8862
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#23 Re: GM70 PP

Post by Paul Barker »

Might find examples on Russian enthusiast forums, using a translator to help you find the talk. Or maybe a search under images will pull up a circuit.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

#24 Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick »

Once Steve tells us what Ia he's aiming for I can recalculate, but let's say for the sake of argument it's 80 (based on nothing more than Steve's "factor of 10" comment).

You'd still need to choose relatively high virtual cathodes to make it practical. I multiply the expected dissipation by 4 and regards that as my minimum, which means at least 8W resistors. Personally I'd strongly recommend not using virtual cathodes.

Screenshot_20190714_165846.jpg
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#25 Re: GM70 PP

Post by ed »

I was looking at 7k transformer when I was messing with this, but that was se..I'm not sure we're not talking pp here but this is what I had:
GM70.pdf
(155.44 KiB) Downloaded 232 times
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15704
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#26 Re: GM70 PP

Post by Nick »

1000v, 80ma, -100v on the grid is not a bad operating point.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21373
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#27 Re: GM70 PP

Post by pre65 »

Re -100v on the grid.

Does that become -80 (or -120) if we take the filament voltage into consideration ?

Cathode resistor taken from + filament connection and NO balancing resistors.

Would filament bias be a STUPID suggestion ? :oops:
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

#28 Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick »

pre65 wrote: Sun Jul 14, 2019 8:28 pm Re -100v on the grid.

Does that become -80 (or -120) if we take the filament voltage into consideration ?

Would filament bias be a STUPID suggestion ? :oops:
Filament bias would be one hell of a heater lol

I've seen datasheets refer to setting the bias relative to the midway point. I attached the cathode to the +ve heater and adjusted bias by half the heater voltage.
User avatar
izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 1496
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Auckland NZ
Contact:

#29 Re: GM70 PP

Post by izzy wizzy »

The amp will be fixed bias like the 813. I'm not into load lines etc as I already have a transformer with configurable secondary. So a bit of adjustment with the fixed bias and wiggle the secondaries round and see what sounds best. My starting point would have been what Nick suggested, 1000V 80mA is about the same as the 813s.

After all the discussion, I think I'll start without the virtual cathode resistors. I'd figured on 22R 10W welwyn w23 for that but maybe won't bother now. Didn't bother with the 4P1L either. I like the simplicity and lack of resistors.

Cheers,
Stephen
RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

#30 Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick »

Surely you're going to try both and tell us which sounds best...?

:o :) :lol:
Post Reply