I have a question about a long tailed pair with a short tail. Imagine your typical long tail phase splitter. To get decent balance on the anodes with resistor loads, the tail should be a big resistor which implies a negative supply or a constant current source. Now instead of resistive anode loads, there's a PP transformer like so
So my question is, with very small signals, phono stage levels, what would be the expected impact on the sound?
cheers,
Stephen
And now make the tail short so it's just a regular biasing resistor to ground. So we end up with something like this with one input grounded and the other signal
It will be unbalanced by 1dB or so accourding to the model and you can see a rise in 2nd harmonic distortion which is to be expected.Long tail pair with a short tail
- izzy wizzy
- Old Hand
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Auckland NZ
- Contact:
#2 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
I would expect as you say a little 2nd, but no other real problem. FYI, in that case I would be looking at a CCS using a DN2535N3-G instead of a 317, they are only 56p from Farnell.
I just found Farnell had them when I had to repair a ARC phono which used them all over the place in LTP tails.
I just found Farnell had them when I had to repair a ARC phono which used them all over the place in LTP tails.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- izzy wizzy
- Old Hand
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Auckland NZ
- Contact:
#3 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
Thanks Nick. I had used the 317 in the line stage but soon got rid and used an input tx and small tail. I'll look up the Farnel part as Ihave an order for there soon. Will be interesting to see if it's audible.
I did some more in the sim and it looks like unbalanced there's about 0.3% 2nd harmonic and balanced about 0.03%. Is 0.3% at full level audible? I have no idea. I'm only doing this as I don't have an SE transformer but can use a PP transformer.
cheers,
Stephen
I did some more in the sim and it looks like unbalanced there's about 0.3% 2nd harmonic and balanced about 0.03%. Is 0.3% at full level audible? I have no idea. I'm only doing this as I don't have an SE transformer but can use a PP transformer.
cheers,
Stephen
#4 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
I have some spare SE transformers if you'd like to try them. I can take to Owston if you want.
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#5 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
What's 0.3% in dB relative to the main signal ?izzy wizzy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:05 pm I did some more in the sim and it looks like unbalanced there's about 0.3% 2nd harmonic and balanced about 0.03%. Is 0.3% at full level audible? I have no idea. I'm only doing this as I don't have an SE transformer but can use a PP transformer.
cheers,
Stephen
Is that -25dB or -50dB ?
Either way, that will be audible, when I was doing the jFet phono input , there was a significant difference in tone from what we calculated to be the difference between no distortion, and distortion giving 2nd-harmonic at -70dB . It was better with the small amount of 2nd. These were sims on Spice , not measured, but I expect the delta was more or less as calculated.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
#6 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
Thing is, the no distortion case wont be no distortion, there will still be higher harmonics down there, but the addition of the 2md will mask them. I found when messing with the monoblocks that distortion down below 0.0005% mattered without the masking of 2nd and 3rd.the difference between no distortion, and distortion giving 2nd-harmonic at -70dB . It was better with the small amount of 2nd.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#7 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
Amazing, isn't it !
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
- izzy wizzy
- Old Hand
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Auckland NZ
- Contact:
#8 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
Interesting stuff.
I don't know if I'm doing this right but anyway I ran 3 circuits. One diff with a short tail, the other with a CCS inthe tail and a single ended version.
This is the FFT traces of all three
The first and 3rd look almost the same with the CCS version having suppressed 2nd harmonic. Is that right?
cheers,
Stephen
I don't know if I'm doing this right but anyway I ran 3 circuits. One diff with a short tail, the other with a CCS inthe tail and a single ended version.
This is the FFT traces of all three
The first and 3rd look almost the same with the CCS version having suppressed 2nd harmonic. Is that right?
cheers,
Stephen
- izzy wizzy
- Old Hand
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Auckland NZ
- Contact:
#9 Re: Long tail pair with a short tail
Thanks for the offer but I won;t be at Owsters ... this time
cheers,
Stephen