Loadline Tools

Subjects that don't have their own home
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8985
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#31 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by Paul Barker »

cool
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5643
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#32 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by simon »

Cressy Snr wrote: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:09 am There is a calculator on this site that calculates distortion https://www.vtadiy.com/loadline-calcula ... alculator/
This can be used in conjunction with the calculator Paul has illustrated above. You can find a suitable op point and self bias resistor with the first calculator, then open another tab, transfer the figures into the other calculator. You input the max swing available and the software will fill in the distortion figures for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th harmonic below.
Just had a play with this and checked what it thinks of my GM70 SE OP:

For V=530V, Vg=-39V, Ia=90mA, Z=5k, P=5.3W, with an output headroom of 230V it's
H2=1.06%, H3=0.14%, H4=0.01%, THD=1.07%

Is this any good?

The only time I've had it near full volume was at Owston last year, normally it's much less and rarely more than half volume. An output headroom of say 130V gives:
H2=0.58, H3=0.04, H4= 0.00, THD=0.58

Higher Z OPTs help of course, but I've got 5k and that's what I'm using!
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10581
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#33 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by Cressy Snr »

Looks alright to me.
it’s better than a triode strapped pentode like mine.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#34 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by JamesD »

Generally an SE triode with no feedback that achieves 1% THD at full power is excellent - normally they are rated at 2-3% THD at full power and sometimes 5% of course domestic usage of an SE triode should normally be at 1W or less and aiming at 0.1% THD or less at 1W for excellent performance. These are not critical numbers and assumes that at least 70% of the distortion is generated in the power stage.

It should be said also that spice modelling of power stages at full power is also subject to error generally less than 10% but some triode models are some way off...
User avatar
izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 1496
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Auckland NZ
Contact:

#35 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by izzy wizzy »

simon wrote: Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:56 pm
Cressy Snr wrote: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:09 am There is a calculator on this site that calculates distortion https://www.vtadiy.com/loadline-calcula ... alculator/
This can be used in conjunction with the calculator Paul has illustrated above. You can find a suitable op point and self bias resistor with the first calculator, then open another tab, transfer the figures into the other calculator. You input the max swing available and the software will fill in the distortion figures for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th harmonic below.
Just had a play with this and checked what it thinks of my GM70 SE OP:

For V=530V, Vg=-39V, Ia=90mA, Z=5k, P=5.3W, with an output headroom of 230V it's
H2=1.06%, H3=0.14%, H4=0.01%, THD=1.07%

Is this any good?

The only time I've had it near full volume was at Owston last year, normally it's much less and rarely more than half volume. An output headroom of say 130V gives:
H2=0.58, H3=0.04, H4= 0.00, THD=0.58

Higher Z OPTs help of course, but I've got 5k and that's what I'm using!
Like you, I popped in some values I'm using for the GM70 and it caused a lot of head scratching. Had to go do some reading to fill in what seems to be the many gaps in what I thought I knew. The figures for PP don't make much sense ie bugger all to 0 distortion.

But what it did show is I should possibly increase the a-a Z that they see which I'll play with by reconfiguring the secondary.
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5643
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#36 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by simon »

Thanks James, not bad then. Might have a bit more of a play later.
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5643
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#37 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by simon »

I thought it would be interesting to model the classic WE 300B and RCA 2A3 SE OPs, and then see what the distortion would be at 1W. I did GM70 as well - the data sheet doesn't offer an OP so used the default values in the programme, as well as what I currently have.
Triode SE Distortions.JPG
Looks like <0.1% THD @ 1W might be a little demanding.
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#38 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by IslandPink »

Cor ! - that's interesting, Simon.
Makes a great case for GM70 copper with a 600V supply, if you have sensitive speakers.
My experiences with GK-71 from 460 supply at only 3Wpc channel were so positive, this is very encouraging.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5643
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#39 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by simon »

Well I guess, and that's all it is, that higher powered valves used at low power should have lower distortion than lower powered valves at higher power, for similar distortion profiles. It's just a shame the GM70 burns a regulated 100W to heat them.

(My understanding of distortion is that it's a consequence of unequally spaced grid lines?)
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#40 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by JamesD »

Double checking the 1W distortion for SE power triodes - and you are right - I was too optimistic at 0.1% and it should be less than 0.5% for good and less than 0.3% for excellent.

My excuse - I have been doing some extensive investigation of Sakuma style SE with PT15 driving PT15 (for instance) and there it is easy to get the 0.1% at 1W as this schema has good distortion cancellation at 1W. In fact its relatively straight forward with a lot of SE designs to use 2nd Harmonic distortion cancellation targeted at 1W output - rather harder to get it to track through all power outputs and particularly above 25% of maximum power out.
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15751
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#41 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by Nick »

In fact its relatively straight forward with a lot of SE designs to use 2nd Harmonic distortion cancellation targeted at 1W output
Especially if you assume that speakers are perfect and resistive.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#42 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by JamesD »

Thats where the Sakuma style design comes in as to a large degree one makes the driving stage mimic the output stage so that the driver stage sees an elliptical load line - thats been part of the area I've been working on to try to get the cancellation to work over a range of output levels - the other is the tracking of non-linearity with increasing signal levels ... two aspects of the same problem
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15751
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#43 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by Nick »

What you need is some way of comparing the output with what the output would be if the load was ideal, than applying the changes that would make the non ideal output mimic the ideal one. :-)
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#44 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by JamesD »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

That made me laugh out loud!!!

Harold Black would be proud of you!
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5643
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#45 Re: Loadline Tools

Post by simon »

JamesD wrote: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:28 pm Thats where the Sakuma style design comes in as to a large degree one makes the driving stage mimic the output stage so that the driver stage sees an elliptical load line - thats been part of the area I've been working on to try to get the cancellation to work over a range of output levels - the other is the tracking of non-linearity with increasing signal levels ... two aspects of the same problem
That's a bit of a leap for me. I thought the driver mimicking the output stage would exacerbate the harmonic distortion profile? But maybe I'm not understanding mimic in this context and using too literal a meaning?

It's years ago I read about eliptical load lines and sadly don't recall much now - is it the AC component???
Post Reply