GZ34 failure modes and reasons

If they glow, this is the place to be
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#1 GZ34 failure modes and reasons

Post by IDM »

Hi One of my monoblocks went off this evening as the fuse had blown. I replaced the fuse and cautiously fired it up. Within about 60 seconds I could see the GZ34 rectifier arcing (flashover?).

The tube is about 4 years old, so is that just end of life failure or is there likely to be something more sinister at play?

The amps are LD2+ and just recently I did modify the PSU to make the first cap 10uf not 100uf as the stock amplifier had. I did this as I thought this would be better for my rectifier.

Cheers
Ian
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21400
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#2

Post by pre65 »

Have you got any resistors before the GZ34 ?

In the date sheet it specifies the resistance needed, but that includes the transformer resistance.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#3

Post by IDM »

Hi

Yes, there is a 75R between the rectifier and the first cap (10uf) then the choke.
Cheers
Ian
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21400
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#4

Post by pre65 »

The limiting resistors go between the transformer and rectifier, one to each anode :)

75R is a common value, depends what voltage you are getting.

See this data sheet for Rt

http://crude.mine.nu/sgz34.html
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#5

Post by IDM »

Oh sorry, misunderstood, mine is not like that it has the resistor between the rectifier and the first cap.

I am assuming the transformer valve rectifier combo is ok as the amplifier was a kit. Though maybe I assume too much!
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21400
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#6

Post by pre65 »

Never assume. :wink:

Perhaps the amp "designer" misunderstood ?

If one half of the transformer secondary winding is 75R or over you won't need them. :)

According to the data sheet they are only needed with cap input.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#7

Post by IDM »

hmmm,

Just pulled the bottom of the amplifier and it looks like the 75R has been incinerated. So it is more sinister than the valve just failing.

I will have to give it a good going over tomorrow :-(
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21400
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#8

Post by pre65 »

Maybe the resistor wattage was underspecified ?

Easiest thing is to measure the total resistance of the transformer secondary (HT bit) and report back.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#9

Post by ed »

just musing..doesn't LD have adjustable cathode bias????

not sure how it's wired but maybe an idea to check the cathode pot
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#10

Post by IDM »

No I dont think there is adjustable cathode bias. There is a 1K cathode resistor on the 300B which I have bypassed with a 90uf capacitor.

I just measured the DCR of the mains transformer secondary and I get 193R for the amp that failed and 192R for the amplifier that is ok. From which I assume the transformer is proably ok.
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#11

Post by IDM »

I also measured the resistance from the rectifier cathode to Earth looking for some form of short, but it measures as 128.7K which is almost exactly right when I calculated all the bleeder resistors and potential dividers in parallel. So I am not sure where to look next. :-(
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#12

Post by IDM »

OK I have now gone over everything and I cannot find any fault. None of the Black Gate PSU caps appear swollen or distorted and nothing else seems out of spec. Yet the burnt resistor tells me that the amplifier did see a sudden and massive current.

The driver circuit is an E180F triode strapped with a 10M45 CCS. I assume that if this had failed then the 10M45 would have fried. Does that seem like a reasonable assumption?

Is it possible or likely that the 300B failed in such a way as to cause a huge current surge?

Cheers
Ian
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#13

Post by ed »

IDM wrote:No I dont think there is adjustable cathode bias. There is a 1K cathode resistor on the 300B which I have bypassed with a 90uf capacitor.

I just measured the DCR of the mains transformer secondary and I get 193R for the amp that failed and 192R for the amplifier that is ok. From which I assume the transformer is proably ok.
ok, pot or not, it may be useful to measure resistance between cathode and ground, just in case
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
IDM
Old Hand
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:50 pm

#14

Post by IDM »

Its 1K. Which is spot-on.
Cheers
Ian
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#15

Post by Mike H »

Commonest causes of V rectifier arcing ~

1. reservoir cap too big a value (I've blown up 2 x 6X5's like that)

2. like Phil says not enough limiting resistance in series with the anodes (although that includes the transformer winding resistance, which is often enough by itself)

3. HT short-circuit downstream, includes a supply capacitor that only breaks down at high Voltage else to all other intents and purposes will look perfectly OK.

The burnt out resistor does sugest #3.....

I've also had in the past a shorted cathode bypass cap on an o/p stage that could blow a supply fuse
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
Post Reply