Hoary Old Chestnut Coax vs Optical

I think we all know by now what this section is for.
Post Reply
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#1 Hoary Old Chestnut Coax vs Optical

Post by Cressy Snr »

Having never used optical digital, I tried an optical cable from the SB3 to the DAC.
The received wisdom for many years has been that optical is sub-standard compared to coax.

Given that my AppleTV is coming tomorrow and only has an optical digital out,
I was a bit concerned that optical would be inferior.

I've been switching between the two digital output methods this afternoon using the Beresford DAC front controls
and I'm damned if I can hear any difference whatsoever.

So what's the deal there then?
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6321
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#2

Post by Ray P »

Maybe your stuff isn't good enough to resolve the difference! :lol:

Seriously, maybe you have a good implementation; common wisdom seems to be that toslink quality is very variable because most of its implementations are a bit cheap and cheerful so the bar, on average, is lower than that set for co-ax.

Ray
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#3

Post by Mike H »

I think that sounds more likely, though I know nowt about it :lol:

But indeed a quick read on wiki once informed me there can be several "quality levels", depending on end application. Mainly down to the digital processing it seems, not necessarily the medium itself. Although there can be a problem with cable length apparently.


 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#4

Post by Cressy Snr »

Mike H wrote:I think that sounds more likely, though I know nowt about it :lol:

What?...That my gear isn't good enough to resolve the differences?

How dare you sir! :D :D
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15748
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#5

Post by Nick »

I have never understood just why optical has that stigma, though maybe it could have something to do with cable makers :-)

There seems to be a common view (may be true, maybe not) that there is more jitter on optical, but I can't see why that would be. assuming the receiver is doing its job and likewise the transmitter, I cant see why optical would suffer more than coax, at least with optical you dont have to worry about reflections at every solder joint, its TTL in at the transmitter, and TTL out at the receiver. Plus you have the same level of galvanic isolation that fitting a transformer would give. And I can;t see why a transformer wouldnt bring its own problems, but they seem to help, I suspect partly because of the isolation.

The fiber we have coming out of the walls at work that provide phone and IP services seem to work just fine. In the case of the IP the light shines from Manchester via York and ends up in Wetherby, so its not that fatally flawed. Or at least thats how it would seem to me. And that runs at a data rate that would provide 20 192/24 Stereo streams (or at least thats what we pay for, I dont know what the actual rate the line will run at).
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#6

Post by Mike H »

Ah that's what it was, synchronisation of the clock rate. The main cause of the slagging off, where the receiver timing is "off".



 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21399
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#7

Post by pre65 »

I thought it was the "conversion" at both ends of the light cable that was the problem ?
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#8

Post by Mike H »

SteveTheShadow wrote:What?...That my gear isn't good enough to resolve the differences?

How dare you sir! :D :D
Shall we meet at dawn for handbags at 20 paces? :lol:


 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
Post Reply