Electronic filter.

For the three and more legged things
Post Reply
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 17316
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex

Electronic filter.

Post by pre65 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:55 am

Saw this on Ebay just now.

Is it similar to the E-choke Mike H used to do ?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Tube-Preamp-A ... 1660715763
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans. John Lennon

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)

Michael L
Old Hand
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:10 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Michael L » Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:21 am

I was talking to MJ last Owston meet up about the pros and cons of such a circuit compared with a filter using a choke.
I admit I didn't fully understand - well I had consumed some beers.
Could someone enlighten me?

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11362
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Nick » Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:38 am

The circuit it there, its a cap multiplier

Image
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 17753
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Mike H » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:12 pm

Yes virtually identical to mine.

Which Nick G helped me with incidentally. :D
 
I never make the same mistake twice. Instead I prefer to fill my day with a variety of different mistakes

Michael L
Old Hand
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:10 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Michael L » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:34 am

Michael L wrote:
Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:21 am
I was talking to MJ last Owston meet up about the pros and cons of such a circuit compared with a filter using a choke.
I admit I didn't fully understand - well I had consumed some beers.
Could someone enlighten me?
Still none the wiser. I assume using a choke must have advantages because it's weight and cost are disadvantages.

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11362
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Nick » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:42 am

The mosfet cap multiplier will filter the DC. A Choke will do that, but will also store energy in its flux which the SS wont do. If a choke is used in choke input, then it has the magic feature of drawing continuous AC current from the transformer.
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 17753
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Mike H » Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:55 am

The electronic version needs an overhead of extra supply Volts, which can be quite awkward to provide. Or in other words, you lose some HT, in my one's case, about 25V minimum. So appreciably less efficient than a genuine inductor choke.
 
I never make the same mistake twice. Instead I prefer to fill my day with a variety of different mistakes

Michael L
Old Hand
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:10 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Michael L » Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:45 pm

Thanks Nick and Mike.

Colin Wonfor
User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:20 pm

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Colin Wonfor » Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:24 pm

Unitrode did a nice SMPSU in a high speed switcher, using current doubling which allowed us to use smaller caps with chokes, a nice design.
We re-worked it with a full resonant bridge circuit and made it RAD Hard and now they are whizzing over head in space. We also used Si plated in Gold.

User avatar
Dave the bass
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10701
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Dave the bass » Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:26 pm

I had to Google 'RAD Hard'!

Respekt!
Dirt eating, low-voltage boy but "'Occasionally phenomenal'"

User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 17753
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

Re: Electronic filter.

Post by Mike H » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:42 pm

Wow .. :shock:
 
I never make the same mistake twice. Instead I prefer to fill my day with a variety of different mistakes

Post Reply