GM70 PP

What people are working on at the moment
izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Folkestone
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by izzy wizzy » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:20 am

RhythMick wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:54 am
Why not think about a slow start option?
I don't think I need one. Nothing goes over voltage, the MVs can handle the current, the wire in the choke will be fine.

I don't mean that to sound dismissive of the idea. Slow start and sequential start gizmos are just not my thing and no one else switches these things on. I have had sequential start things in the past and they just drive me nuts in the end.

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11984
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: GM70 PP

Post by Nick » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:34 am

I don't think I need one. Nothing goes over voltage, the MVs can handle the current, the wire in the choke will be fine.
Would get my vote, I use slow start to protect the input fuse, better to have components that are happy with worst case situations.

BTW, one of the things that makes winding a choke input choke different from a cap input one is the voltage it has to withstand from one terminal to the other, so the way the windings are laid down and insulation between layers becomes important.
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 565
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:42 am

Nick wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:34 am
BTW, one of the things that makes winding a choke input choke different from a cap input one is the voltage it has to withstand from one terminal to the other, so the way the windings are laid down and insulation between layers becomes important.
The Lundahl datasheet quotes "insulation between windings and core" as 4kv ... The max signal voltage AC RMS is also quoted, 450V for the 2743.

izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Folkestone
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by izzy wizzy » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:51 am

Nick wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:34 am
I use slow start to protect the input fuse, better to have components that are happy with worst case situations.
From memory, it's a while ago now, I used a varistor/MOV doodad to give things an easier start and then relay bypass it with the start sequencer.

What slow start gizmo are you using Nick?

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11984
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: GM70 PP

Post by Nick » Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:10 pm

I use a couple of relays, and some paralleled resistors to start up with the resistors in series, then bipass them. But I only do that for a few tenths of seconds while the torrid inrush goes away. This is with solid state BTW.
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Folkestone
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by izzy wizzy » Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:11 pm

pre65 wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:04 am
One reason why I like 6D22s damper diodes. :)
A very good option and if I wasn't addicted to mercury, would be the way to go. I even have them in the shed.

RhythMick
Old Hand
Posts: 565
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: GM70 PP

Post by RhythMick » Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:12 pm

I went with thermistors in the mains primary, bypassed by relay after a few tenths of a second.

izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Folkestone
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by izzy wizzy » Thu Nov 14, 2019 1:10 pm

RhythMick wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:12 pm
I went with thermistors in the mains primary, bypassed by relay after a few tenths of a second.
That's what I meant. One of them, not varistor/MOV as I said earlier.

User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 18430
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by Mike H » Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:51 pm

izzy wizzy wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:03 pm
So dragged MJ of the shelf and he is talking about peak currents so your example Nick would seem to follow what he says and the PSUD sim is useful in that regard. For the current draw of 60mA and that choke, it should be rated higher than 78mA.
As you're using PSUD, have a look at the rectifier currents. You should find each one is conducting almost the entire half cycle. This is different to cap input, when they conduct only on the peaks. This is because after the input peak the choke field collapses and induces a current in its winding, in the same direction. The input end of the choke then becomes the negative going end of what is now a current source, and that keeps the rectifier(s) conducting to quite a low Voltage.
 
I never make the same mistake twice. Instead I prefer to fill my day with a variety of different mistakes

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11984
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: GM70 PP

Post by Nick » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:26 pm

Mike H wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:51 pm
izzy wizzy wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:03 pm
So dragged MJ of the shelf and he is talking about peak currents so your example Nick would seem to follow what he says and the PSUD sim is useful in that regard. For the current draw of 60mA and that choke, it should be rated higher than 78mA.
As you're using PSUD, have a look at the rectifier currents. You should find each one is conducting almost the entire half cycle. This is different to cap input, when they conduct only on the peaks. This is because after the input peak the choke field collapses and induces a current in its winding, in the same direction. The input end of the choke then becomes the negative going end of what is now a current source, and that keeps the rectifier(s) conducting to quite a low Voltage.
And that is why you get such a large voltage across the choke. And why you don't get switching spikes.
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 18430
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by Mike H » Sat Nov 16, 2019 12:06 am

Image and wot he said. :D

Took me ages to get my head round how choke input works. Must be threads around here from about 10 years ago, when Nick was trying to explain it.
 
I never make the same mistake twice. Instead I prefer to fill my day with a variety of different mistakes

izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Folkestone
Contact:

Re: GM70 PP

Post by izzy wizzy » Sun Dec 01, 2019 7:41 pm

After living with the Lehane regs on the GM70 fils, I got to thinking I was not liking things as much, even turning off a few times as the sound was quite sterile and not for me so got it out to have a look. Noted the common connection was the negative end while the 4P1L was the positive fil connection. I had reasoned that the positive connection should be the common one yet connected the GM70 differently. Altered the GM70 to the same config as the 4P1L and bingo, back in business and the gap between this connection and the SMPS is far greater now.

One thing the Lehane filament regs do is open up the top end end I thought things up top had got a bit much; a bit tilted up. So replaced the Lundahl 1676 on the input wired as 1:4 with a Sowter 3575 which is 1:1. I don't need the gain of the 1:4 any more. Oooh dear, that kinda sucked the life out of things tonally and dynamically. Googled around a bit and found some info from Lynn Olson who had measured the 1676 finding it to have an incredible measured frequency response and very impressive phase splitting performance at 1:1 when loaded correctly, slightly worse at 1:2. So bunged it back in at 1:1 and most of my reservations about the top have been much reduced so will see over time. I may have to experiment with loading to see what happens.

Planning for a front end supply is ongoing. I need to get an order off to Majestic for some more iron to do this properly. Anyone I've read about having a separate driver supply rates the result as significant so got me thinking, I should do this properly.

Cheers,
Stephen

Post Reply